Non-confidential facts and advice to the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime (DMPC)
1. Introduction and background
1.1. The claim, brought by members of the public, are for breaches of Article 2 ECHR.
2. Financial Comments
2.1. The cost of any settlement, if agreed, would be met from the centrally held MPS third party claims provision budget.
3. Legal Comments
3.1. MOPAC has the power to pay any sum required in connection with the settlement for any claim made against the Commissioner under Section 88 of the Police Act 1996.
3.2. Pursuant to the MOPAC Scheme of Delegation dated October 2016, MOPAC must authorise settlements above £50,000.00, or those claims that are otherwise high profile or sensitive, according to the criteria set out in section 4.10 of the Scheme.
3.3. There is an open and exempt report as some of the information relates to data protection, is commercially sensitive and is legal professional privileged.
4. GDPR and Data Privacy
4.1. The processing of personal data has been minimised as part of this decision and is held within Part 2 of the report.
5. Equality Comments
5.1. To continue policing with the consent of the population it serves, the police will always seek to treat everyone fairly and openly. Race or equality issues do not appear to have an impact in this matter.
6. Background/supporting papers
6.1. Refer to Part 2 of the report.